Case study

Process Equipment Corporation

Multi-level assemblies, a significant share of the process at outside job workers, and costing that had to span both. The exact shape of problem NextGenManager was built for.

The starting point

Process equipment is a demanding thing to build in an MSME. Assemblies run several levels deep, individual items move between in-house machining and outside processes several times before despatch, and each of those movements is a GST event with a clock attached to it.

Before the deployment, the pattern was the familiar one: engineering data maintained outside any system, job-work movements tracked on paper, and costing reconstructed after the fact rather than known while the job was running. None of that is unusual, and none of it is anyone's fault — it is what happens when the available software either understands accounting or understands production, but never both.

What was configured

The deployment covers the full path from engineering through to the ledger, rather than a single module bolted alongside existing tools.

Engineering and BOMs

The item master and multi-level bills of materials were built in the system with ECO version control switched on from the start. A revision now carries a change number, a reason and an approval, and effective-from dating means an order already in progress keeps the revision it was released against rather than silently picking up a new one.

Operation costing across in-house and outside work

Routings were modelled with the costing mode set per operation. In-house machining steps use calculated hourly or rate × quantity depending on how the operation is actually paid; outside processes use the subcontracted per-unit rate, which is deliberately excluded from the in-house overhead base so the plant is not absorbing overhead on work it did not perform. All of it rolls up into one figure per assembly.

Job work and the return window

Delivery challans are raised from the system with the GST Section 143 and Rule 45 fields populated natively. Each dispatch carries its own return-by date and ageing clock, and the challan register shows where each consignment sits against that deadline — which is the difference between managing the exposure and discovering it at filing time.

Inventory and accounts

Goods receipts, material issues and production output move stock and post journal entries in the same transaction, so the inventory sub-ledger and the control account are reconcilable at any point rather than once a year. Sales orders, tax invoices, vendor bills and the GST returns run on the same data.

Where it stands

Engineering, production, stores, sales and accounting all run on the system today. The practical change is not that any single task became faster — it is that the BOM the engineer maintains, the challan the storekeeper raises and the figure the accountant sees are now the same record, rather than three versions of it kept in step by hand.

Whether this resembles your plant

If your assemblies go more than one level deep, if parts leave the premises mid-process and come back, and if you have ever quoted a job without being certain what the last one actually cost — this deployment is a reasonable model for what yours would look like.

The honest caveat is the same one we put on every page: your timeline will be decided by the state of your item master and BOMs, not by the software. That is the part worth talking about first.

The capabilities behind this deployment

Everything described above is standard product, not bespoke work.